ACHC vs AMED — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
ACHC and AMED diverge most on accruals (ACHC 94 vs 50) and quality (AMED 50 vs 17). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

ACHCAMED
Metric
ACHC
Healthcare
AMED
Healthcare
Framler score
54
[895]
44
[590]
Verdictmixedmixed
RegimeTXTX
PatternMIXEDNO EDGE
Price change-3.41%+0.01%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityPOORNEUTRAL
ValueNEUTRALNEUTRAL
MomentumGOODNEUTRAL
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOOR
Short int.STRONGNEUTRAL
Options flowWEAKNEUTRAL
SpilloverGOODGOOD
AccrualsSTRONGNEUTRAL
Sector mom.GOODGOOD
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).