ACGL vs AMG — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
ACGL and AMG diverge most on options flow (ACGL 80 vs 43) and NLP tone (AMG 31 vs 0). They are most aligned on insider flow (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

ACGLAMG
Metric
ACGL
Financial Services
AMG
Financial Services
Framler score
62
[1695]
57
[1195]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeTXTX
PatternCOMPOUNDERCOMPOUNDER
Price change+0.47%+2.18%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODGOOD
ValueNEUTRALNEUTRAL
MomentumGOODNEUTRAL
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORWEAK
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowSTRONGWEAK
SpilloverWEAKPOOR
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).