ACGL vs ALL — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
ACGL and ALL diverge most on insider flow (ACGL 50 vs 27) and PEAD drift (ALL 66 vs 49). They are most aligned on NLP tone (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

ACGLALL
Metric
ACGL
Financial Services
ALL
Financial Services
Framler score
62
[1695]
64
[1895]
Verdictbullishbullish
RegimeTXTX
PatternCOMPOUNDERCONFIRMED BEAT
Price change+0.47%-1.16%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODSTRONG
ValueNEUTRALNEUTRAL
MomentumGOODSTRONG
PEADNEUTRALGOOD
InsiderNEUTRALPOOR
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALWEAK
Options flowSTRONGGOOD
SpilloverWEAKWEAK
AccrualsGOODNEUTRAL
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALGOOD

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).