ACGL vs AFL — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
ACGL and AFL diverge most on insider flow (ACGL 50 vs 10) and NLP tone (AFL 28 vs 0). They are most aligned on short interest (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

ACGLAFL
Metric
ACGL
Financial Services
AFL
Financial Services
Framler score
62
[1695]
50
[595]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeTXTX
PatternCOMPOUNDER
Price change+0.47%-0.49%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODNEUTRAL
ValueNEUTRALGOOD
MomentumGOODGOOD
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderNEUTRALPOOR
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowSTRONGGOOD
SpilloverWEAKWEAK
AccrualsGOODNEUTRAL
Sector mom.WEAKWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).