ABT vs AMED — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
ABT and AMED diverge most on insider flow (ABT 90 vs 50) and spillover (ABT 73 vs 59). They are most aligned on PEAD drift (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

ABTAMED
Metric
ABT
Healthcare
AMED
Healthcare
Framler score
55
[995]
44
[590]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeROTX
PatternNO EDGE
Price change-0.50%+0.01%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityWEAKNEUTRAL
ValueNEUTRALNEUTRAL
MomentumGOODNEUTRAL
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderSTRONGNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOOR
Short int.NEUTRALNEUTRAL
Options flowNEUTRALNEUTRAL
SpilloverSTRONGGOOD
AccrualsGOODNEUTRAL
Sector mom.GOODGOOD
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).