ABT vs ALGN — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
ABT and ALGN diverge most on insider flow (ABT 90 vs 50) and options flow (ABT 47 vs 14). They are most aligned on Q×V×M (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

ABTALGN
Metric
ABT
Healthcare
ALGN
Healthcare
Framler score
55
[995]
68
[2295]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeROTX
PatternPIOTROSKI HIGH
Price change-0.50%+5.30%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityWEAKNEUTRAL
ValueNEUTRALGOOD
MomentumGOODWEAK
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderSTRONGNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALGOOD
Options flowNEUTRALPOOR
SpilloverSTRONGNEUTRAL
AccrualsGOODGOOD
Sector mom.GOODGOOD
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).