ABT vs ACHC — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
ABT and ACHC diverge most on insider flow (ABT 90 vs 50) and short interest (ABT 54 vs 20). They are most aligned on PEAD drift (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

ABTACHC
Metric
ABT
Healthcare
ACHC
Healthcare
Framler score
55
[995]
54
[895]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeROTX
PatternMIXED
Price change-0.50%-3.41%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityWEAKPOOR
ValueNEUTRALNEUTRAL
MomentumGOODGOOD
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderSTRONGNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALSTRONG
Options flowNEUTRALWEAK
SpilloverSTRONGGOOD
AccrualsGOODSTRONG
Sector mom.GOODGOOD
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).