AAPL vs ALRM — Multi-factor Comparison

Bottom line
AAPL and ALRM diverge most on insider flow (ALRM 50 vs 10) and options flow (AAPL 78 vs 42). They are most aligned on NLP tone (within 0 points). Research signal — not investment advice.

Compare tickers

Side-by-side multi-factor analysis across 2-4 tickers. Every factor score the Framler engine computes, plus regime state, confluence pattern override, and 90% prediction interval — ranked colour-wise across the selected cohort on each row.

AAPLALRM
Metric
AAPL
Technology
ALRM
Technology
Framler score
65
[1995]
47
[593]
Verdictbullishmixed
RegimeROTX
PatternREGIME ALIGNED
Price change+1.10%+1.31%
Factor scores (0-100)
QualityGOODNEUTRAL
ValueWEAKNEUTRAL
MomentumSTRONGWEAK
PEADNEUTRALNEUTRAL
InsiderPOORNEUTRAL
NLP tonePOORPOOR
Short int.NEUTRALGOOD
Options flowSTRONGWEAK
SpilloverSTRONGNEUTRAL
AccrualsNEUTRALGOOD
Sector mom.STRONGWEAK
Q × V × MNEUTRALNEUTRAL

How to read this. Colour scale runs bright-green at 65+ to bright-red below 35 across every row. A ticker with mostly green cells and a bullish pattern is a coherent long thesis; mostly red with a bearish pattern is a coherent short. Mixed colour rows suggest factor disagreement — cross-check against the pattern library to see which setup the composite resolved to. Short interest is colour-inverted (high score = low actual SI, shown green because absence of crowded shorts is bullish).